Controlling Global Warming

Controlling Global Warming

Perspectives from Economics, Game Theory and Public Choice

New Horizons in Environmental Economics series

Edited by Christoph Böhringer, Michael Finus and Carsten Vogt

In this exhaustive study, the authors break new ground by integrating cutting edge insights on global warming from three different perspectives: game theory, cost-effectiveness analysis and public choice. For each perspective the authors provide an overview of important results, discuss the theoretical consistency of the models and assumptions, highlight the practical problems which are not yet captured by theory and explore the different applications to the various problems encountered in global warming. They demonstrate how each perspective has its own merits and weaknesses, and advocate an integrated approach as the best way forward. They also propose a research agenda for the future which encompasses the three methods to create a powerful tool for the analysis and resolution of global pollution problems.

Chapter 2: Game Theory and International Environmental Cooperation: Any Practical Application?

Michael Finus

Subjects: economics and finance, environmental economics, environment, environmental economics

Extract

2. Game Theory and International Environmental Cooperation: Any Practical Application? Michael Finus 1. INTRODUCTION The game-theoretical analysis of international environmental problems has received increasing attention in recent years. This is not surprising. Game theory analyzes the interaction between agents, formulates hypotheses about their behavior and predicts the fmal outcome. Therefore, game theory is particularly suited to analysing the incentive structure of international environmental problems. Central questions which can be investigated with this method are: Under which conditions will an international environmental agreement (IEA) be signed and ratified? On which reduction targets will the negotiators agree? How many and which countries will sign an IEA? Will the agreement be stable? Which measures may be used to stabilize an IEA? The game-theoretical literature has provided many insights into these questions in recent years. Many results have been obtained which help to explain the difficulties of establishing effective and efficient cooperation. However, game-theoretical approaches have also been criticized for ignoring too many practical problems and for being based on very specific assumptions. It has been argued that important aspects of international pollution problems have been neglected and results were not general and therefore ill-suited for policy analyses and recommendations. This chapter tries to qualify this criticism by laying out fundamental assumptions and important results and by pointing out those aspects which have to be treated in future research. We will proceed in five steps. In a first step we explicitly lay out the fundamental assumptions underlying the analysis of international environmental problems (Section...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information