Table of Contents

The Elgar Companion To Economics and Philosophy

The Elgar Companion To Economics and Philosophy

Elgar original reference

Edited by John B. Davis, Alain Marciano and Jochen Runde

The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy aims to demonstrate exactly how these two important areas have always been linked, and to illustrate the key areas of overlap. The contributors are well-known and distinguished authors from a variety of disciplines, who have been invited both to survey and to provide a personal assessment of current and prospective future states of their respective areas of philosophical interest.

Chapter 5: Institutional Economics: From Menger and Veblen to Coase and North

Geoffrey M. Hodgson

Subjects: economics and finance, methodology of economics


Geoffrey M. Hodgson Introduction Institutional economics is now a major subdiscipline, with important applications to studies of business, developing economies, transitional economies, property rights and much else. Prominent names in this ‘new institutional economics’ include the Nobel Laureates Ronald Coase and Douglass North, as well as Oliver Williamson – the most highly cited economist of all time. In some respects their work continues a tradition which can be traced back to Carl Menger in the nineteenth century. Modern ‘new institutional economics’ was also preceded in America in the interwar period by another tradition of ‘institutional economics’, inspired by Thorstein Veblen, Wesley Mitchell and John Commons. For a time this was pervasive in leading American universities and research institutes. This entry surveys both the ‘new’ and the ‘old’ institutional economics, with a focus on some important theoretical and philosophical issues. Foremost among these are the questions of methodological individualism, the depicted relationship between individuals and institutions, and the nature of institutions themselves. These issues tie in closely with the question of the relationship between agency and structure, which is central to the philosophy of the social sciences. It is proposed here that there are distinguishing and characteristic theoretical approaches within both the ‘old’ and the ‘new’ institutionalism, and hence in some respects the two traditions contrast with each other. However, it is important to emphasize that there are not only important theoretical and philosophical differences between each camp, but also within each camp. Furthermore, these internal differences are no less great if...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information