Table of Contents

The Elgar Companion To Economics and Philosophy

The Elgar Companion To Economics and Philosophy

Elgar original reference

Edited by John B. Davis, Alain Marciano and Jochen Runde

The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy aims to demonstrate exactly how these two important areas have always been linked, and to illustrate the key areas of overlap. The contributors are well-known and distinguished authors from a variety of disciplines, who have been invited both to survey and to provide a personal assessment of current and prospective future states of their respective areas of philosophical interest.

Chapter 12: Rhetoric and Postmodernism in Economics

Robert F. Garnett Jr.

Subjects: economics and finance, methodology of economics


Robert F. Garnett, Jr. Introduction In the early 1960s, at the height of the Cold War, the scientific confidence of American economists seemed unshakable (Bernstein 1999; Morgan and Rutherford 1998; Stein 1996). College students were learning from Paul Samuelson’s Economics (1964) that business cycles were a thing of the past. Professional economists were hearing similar pronouncements from leading theorists such as Samuelson’s MIT colleague, Robert Solow: Most economists [now] feel that short-run macroeconomic theory is pretty well in hand. … The basic outlines of the dominant theory have not changed in years. All that is left is the trivial job of filling in the empty boxes, and that will not take more than 50 years of concentrated effort at maximum. (Solow, cited in Hahn and Brechling 1965, p. 146) Samuelson and Solow were chief architects of this ‘dominant theory,’ a neoclassical-Keynesian synthesis that was hailed as the grand unification theory of modern economics, a marriage of neoclassical microeconomics and Keynesian macroeconomics that promised to bring final, scientific closure to lingering debates over the causes and implications of the Great Depression. The 1961 appointment of Solow and two other neoclassical-Keynesians to President Kennedy’s Council of Economic Advisers and the famous success of their 1963 tax cut signaled the arrival of economics as a policy science. It also shifted arguments for American supremacy from the old-fashioned moralism of the McCarthy period to the progressive notion that U.S. economic engineers were better equipped than their Soviet counterparts to deliver...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information