Table of Contents

A Handbook of Economic Anthropology

A Handbook of Economic Anthropology

Elgar original reference

Edited by James G. Carrier

This unique Handbook contains substantial and invaluable summary discussions of work on economic processes and issues, and on the relationship between economic and non-economic areas of life. Furthermore it describes conceptual orientations that are important among economic anthropologists, and presents summaries of key issues in the anthropological study of economic life in different regions of the world. Its scope and accessibility make it useful both to those who are interested in a particular topic and to those who want to see the breadth and fruitfulness of an anthropological study of economics.

Chapter 32: The Near East

Julia Elyachar

Subjects: economics and finance, behavioural and experimental economics, economic psychology, methodology of economics, social policy and sociology, research methods in social policy, sociology and sociological theory

Extract

Julia Elyachar Economic anthropology of the Near East is a subfield waiting to exist. Of 213 listings under the heading ‘economic anthropology’ in the Library of Congress system, there are only two books that deal with the Near East (Manger 1984; Tully 1988). Similarly, there were only five articles on the Near East published in the journal Research in Economic Anthropology between 1978 and 2002. The lack of articles on the Near East in recent important collections in economic anthropology is also striking (Appadurai 1986; Hann 1998; Humphrey and Hugh-Jones 1992; Parry and Bloch 1989).1 This lack of attention to the Near East in economic anthropology, or the lack of attention to economic anthropology among scholars of the Near East, is particular noteworthy in a period where the region was often at the centre of attention of global political concerns, for better or worse. The Near East has traditionally been associated with three theoretical concerns in anthropology: Islam, segmentation and the harem (Abu-Lughod 1989). That limited focus has now changed somewhat, but Abu-Lughod’s statement (1989: 299) that ‘economic anthropology has hardly been done in the Middle East’ remains true. In political discourse as well as in anthropology, the Near East is still stereotyped as a place where religion, honour and family are more important than economy or the market. The old ‘zones of theory’ in anthropology of the Near East (Abu-Lughod 1989) still seem to hold fast. In our publications, if not in our thinking, the region appears to...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information