Table of Contents

Handbook of Knowledge and Economics

Handbook of Knowledge and Economics

Elgar original reference

Edited by Richard Arena, Agnès Festré and Nathalie Lazaric

By illuminating the philosophical roots of the various notions of knowledge employed by economists, this Handbook helps to disentangle conceptual and typological issues surrounding the debate on knowledge amongst economists. Wide-ranging in scope, it explores fundamental aspects of the relationship between knowledge and economics – such as the nature of knowledge, knowledge acquisition and knowledge diffusion.

Chapter 5: The Pragmatist View of Knowledge and Beliefs in Institutional Economics: The Significance of Habits of Thought, Transactions and Institutions in the Conception of Economic Behavior

Véronique Dutraive

Subjects: economics and finance, evolutionary economics


Véronique Dutraive 5.1 INTRODUCTION A major trend of modern economics is to emphasize the role of institutions in economic phenomena, long after the work of old institutionalist economists. The revival of the theory of institutions owes much to North’s contribution to economic history and growth macroeconomics based on property rights and transaction costs. Subsequently, stemming from the influential works of Coase and Williamson, the interest in institutions has spread to the theory of the firm and of economic organization, and more widely to microeconomics. One of the important questions now discussed is the relation between institutions and cognition, and North himself has drawn attention to this point (Denzau and North, 1994, p. 5). The competences and capabilities theories of the firm and more widely evolutionary economics are now connecting evolutionary processes and cognition (Egidi and Rizzello, 2004). In this context, old American institutionalism, in particular the contributions of Veblen and Commons, have been rediscovered and recognized as having anticipated some of the trends of contemporary economic analysis (Hodgson, 2004; Rutherford, 2001; Samuels, 1995). Indeed, Veblen and Commons, dissatisfied with the conception of human agency in the exclusive terms of the theory of rational choice, pioneered the focus on the importance of institutions for our understanding of the dynamics of economic phenomena in modern societies and made early claims that economics must have some interaction with other sciences and particularly with the psychological sciences. There is a common agreement that Veblen’s and Commons’s conceptions of knowledge rely on American pragmatist...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information