Table of Contents

Handbook of Knowledge and Economics

Handbook of Knowledge and Economics

Elgar original reference

Edited by Richard Arena, Agnès Festré and Nathalie Lazaric

By illuminating the philosophical roots of the various notions of knowledge employed by economists, this Handbook helps to disentangle conceptual and typological issues surrounding the debate on knowledge amongst economists. Wide-ranging in scope, it explores fundamental aspects of the relationship between knowledge and economics – such as the nature of knowledge, knowledge acquisition and knowledge diffusion.

Chapter 7: The knowledge–Rationality Connection in Herbert Simon

Salvatore Rizzello and Anna Spada

Subjects: economics and finance, evolutionary economics


Salvatore Rizzello and Anna Spada 7.1 INTRODUCTION The central role of knowledge for economics was already manifest during the 1930s, but it was during the 1950s that it became especially evident. The 1950s are mainly characterized by a confrontation between the economists defending rational choice theory and those who intend to develop new tools, which will constitute the grounds for a psychologybased theory of decision. The confrontation revolves around the issue of uncertainty in decision making, which also emerged during the 1950s as an unintended consequence of expected utility theory (von Neumann and Morgenstern, 1944). Those economists who were trying to keep rational choice theory alive pursued their goal at two different levels: first, at the analytical level, with the attempt to make the neoclassical assumptions of rationality explicit, in order to reduce the psychological distortions which generated deviations from the expected utility model (Savage, 1954). The attempt was also pursued at the epistemological level, with the evolutionary foundation of rationality (Friedman, 1953). The major goal of this defence of rational choice, at both levels, is to free economic models from uncertainty. During the same period, however, there were several contributions that took another direction and tried to elaborate a descriptive theory of decisionmaking, including uncertainty as one of its unavoidable characteristics. During the 1950s, therefore, uncertainty was the central problem for economists, and the relevance of knowledge was mainly related to the role that this concept could play as an instrument to face uncertainty in decision making. We can...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information