Academic Entrepreneurship

Academic Entrepreneurship

University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation

New Horizons in Entrepreneurship series

Scott Shane

In this unique and timely volume, Scott Shane systematically explains the formation of university spinoff companies and their role in the commercialization of university technology and wealth creation in the United States and elsewhere. The importance of university spinoff activity is discussed and the historical development of university spinoff ventures is traced over time.

Chapter 4: Variation in Spinoff Activities Across Institutions

Scott Shane

Subjects: business and management, entrepreneurship, management and universities, education, management and universities

Extract

This chapter discusses an important empirical observation about university spinoffs: the wide variance across universities in their tendency to produce spinoff companies. This chapter will explain why some universities, like Arizona State University and Harvard University, produce virtually no new companies, despite generating a large number of technological inventions, whereas other universities, like Carnegie Mellon University and Emory University, produce a large number of spinoffs, given their level of technological production. As this chapter explains, three key factors appear to explain cross-university variation in spinoff activity: university policies, technology licensing office expertise, and university goals and culture. Each of these explanations will be explored in turn, but first some evidence of the concentration in spinoff activity in a relatively small set of universities is provided. THE CONCENTRATION OF SPINOFF ACTIVITY Many observers have noted that university spinoff activity is concentrated in a small number of academic institutions. Describing her interactions with 70 different academic institutions as a representative of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Leonard (2001) points out strong variance across the institutions in their interest in, and support of, spinoffs. In a more quantitative observation, Pressman (2002) reported that, in 2000, 121 academic institutions in the United States generated spinoff companies, while 69 institutions (36 percent) did not.1 The variance across universities in the rate of spinoff company formation is not limited to the United States. Charles and Conway (2001) reported that, in 2000, 24 universities accounted for 75 percent of all spinoffs in the United Kingdom. In fact,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information