Table of Contents

Handbook on Responsible Leadership and Governance in Global Business

Handbook on Responsible Leadership and Governance in Global Business

Elgar original reference

Edited by Jonathan P. Doh and Stephen A. Stumpf

Ethics, social responsibility, leadership, governance. These terms are heard in the classroom, in the boardroom, and viewed on the front page of newspapers and magazines. Yet serious attention to the relationships among these concepts is lacking. Although commitments to leadership, ethics, and social responsibility are evident, individuals and companies are falling short in combining these duties into policies and cultures that guide behavior and decisions. The missing element is a broad-based and integrated approach to responsible leadership and governance. This volume provides the leading thinking on these issues and includes a discussion of emerging areas that require future attention.

Chapter 6: Developing Strategies and Skills for Responsible Leadership

Kim Cameron and Arran Caza

Subjects: business and management, business leadership, corporate social responsibility, international business


Kim Cameron and Arran Caza Introduction The idea of responsible leadership is not new, and the literature on effective leadership has always been characterized by an element of responsibility (Burns, 1978; Yukl et al., 2002). Responsibility most often has been synonymous with accountability (as in being accountable for performance) or with freedom of action indicating that responsible individuals have discretion or volition (as in having responsibility at work). These two connotations of responsibility are closely related, as people are more likely to be accountable if they are able to act freely (Brown, 1986; Salancik and Meindl, 1984). In these two senses, responsibility means ‘response-able’, or possessing the capability and the accountability needed to respond. A third connotation of the concept of responsible leadership is less frequently used but equally meaningful. It refers to the ability or inclination to act in an appropriate fashion. Appropriateness is key to this connotation in that it associates responsible action with what is right, correct, or beneficial. Behaving responsibly means doing good (Walsh et al., 2003). This latter usage of responsibility places the concept in the domain of a newly emerging field of study called Positive Organizational Scholarship (POS). This focuses on the investigation of what goes right in organizations (rather than what goes wrong), what is life-giving (rather than life-depleting), what is experienced as good (rather than bad), what is inspiring (rather than depressing) and what brings elevation to individuals and systems (rather than diminishing). Responsibility used in the first two ways is...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information