Size and Local Democracy

Size and Local Democracy

Bas Denters, Michael Goldsmith, Andreas Ladner, Poul Erik Mouritzen and Lawrence E. Rose

How large should local governments be, and what are the implications of changing the scale of local governments for the quality of local democracy? These questions have stood at the centre of debates among scholars and public sector reformers alike from antiquity to the present. This monograph offers the first systematic cross-national investigation of these questions using empirical evidence gathered specifically for this purpose. Results provide insights that offer important touchstones for reform activities and academic research efforts in many countries.

Chapter 7: Political competence

Bas Denters, Michael Goldsmith, Andreas Ladner, Poul Erik Mouritzen and Lawrence E. Rose

Subjects: politics and public policy, public policy


If citizens are to exercise reasoned control over political decision making, interest and knowledge are only part of the story. A key supposition for the operation and maintenance of genuine democratic control is that citizens should also possess a sense of personal political competence, a belief that ‘they are capable of understanding politics and competent enough to participate in political acts’ (Acock et al. 1985: 1064). As Abravanel and Busch (1975: 61) state, ‘In a society committed to popular rule, a widely shared sense of political competence encourages an aware and active citizenry and thus allows some influence over the general direction of public policy’. To lack subjective political competence will for many constitute a psychological obstacle to political involvement and hence serve to weaken the foundation of democratic government. If individuals are to enter the political arena and contribute to the processes of democratic decision making, in short, they need to feel adequately qualified and capable of taking part on an equal footing with their fellow citizens. Legal provisions are often important in this respect. Struggles for emancipation and equal voting rights offer a classic illustration of efforts to remove the onerous distinction between different segments of society, a distinction that bears a stigma suggesting that some individuals are less qualified to take part in democratic government than others. But apart from such formal stipulations, an informal sense of personal worth and competence is equally significant; it is a condition which serves to lower the barrier to personal involvement in politics.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information