EU Consumer Law and Policy

EU Consumer Law and Policy

Elgar European Law series

Stephen Weatherill

In many respects the consumer is supposed to be the ultimate beneficiary of the process of market integration in Europe, but the EC Treaty has never included an elaborate recognition of how the EU serves the consumer interest. This highly esteemed book, now in a brand new edition, provides a comprehensive and up-to-date introduction to the subject, explaining the evolution of consumer law and policy in the EC in terms of both legislative and judicial activity.

Chapter 6: Product Liability

Stephen Weatherill

Subjects: law - academic, consumer law, european law


THE PRODUCT LIABILITY DIRECTIVE Directive 85/374 (as amended) harmonizes laws concerning liability for defective products.1 It is commonly referred to as the ‘Product Liability Directive’. Strictly, it is a measure adopted in order to advance the integration of the market. Its Treaty base is Article 100 (which is now Article 94). Harmonization of national provisions concerning the liability of the producer for damage caused by defectiveness of products is required in the light of the distortions in competition in the Community and the impact on the movement of goods which are caused by divergences between the laws of the different Member States. However, the harmonization of laws governing liability for defective products has a profound impact on the position of the consumer. Accordingly Directive 85/374 is a major measure of Community consumer protection policy, albeit, in strict constitutional terms, as an incidental consequence of its principal objective. The first Commission proposal in the field of product liability appeared in 1976.2 The fact that it took nine years thereafter to achieve agreement on the Directive indicates the depth of controversy which surrounded this initiative. National systems of tort law vary, especially in their choice of the criteria according to which shall be judged the liability of the supplier to an injured consumer.3 Aspects of the debate are reflected in the text of the Directive that was finally adopted. In several areas the mark of uncomfortable compromise is unmistakeable. In particular, a small number of options is permitted to Member States, which...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information