Table of Contents

The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics, Second Edition

The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics, Second Edition

Elgar original reference

Edited by Jürgen G. Backhaus

This thoroughly updated and revised edition of a popular and authoritative reference work introduces the reader to the major concepts and leading contributors in the field of law and economics. The Companion features accessible, informative and provocative entries on all the significant issues, and breaks new ground by bringing together widely dispersed yet theoretically congruent ideas.

Chapter 26: Dispute Resolution

Thomas J. Miceli

Subjects: economics and finance, law and economics, law - academic, law and economics


Thomas J. Miceli* Introduction Economists are interested in the resolution of legal disputes for several reasons. First, the manner in which parties resolve their disputes (whether by settlement or trial) has an effect on the cost of operating the legal system. Second, economic theory can explain how parties will resolve their disputes (positive analysis), and can therefore prescribe procedural rules for lowering the cost of dispute resolution (normative analysis). Finally, legal disputes provide the raw material from which courts make new legal rules or reaffirm old ones. These rules in turn serve as guides for decisions that affect the rate at which disputes will arise in the future (for example, investment in precaution against accidents). This entry examines the economic analysis of the way legal disputes are resolved. It begins by examining the settlement–trial decision. The analysis shows that settlement will be the predominant outcome given the mutual gain to the parties from avoiding litigation costs. In order to explain the existence of trials, researchers have proposed the existence of differing perceptions or asymmetric information by the parties regarding the outcome of a trial. The resulting models offer insights into various methods for controlling the costs of litigation. In this context, we examine the practice of pre-trial discovery and cost shifting under the English Rule and Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The discussion then turns to the question of whether there is too much litigation from a social perspective, and to various explanations for...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information