International Corporate Governance

International Corporate Governance

A Case Study Approach

Edited by Christine A. Mallin

Corporate governance has become a global phenomenon. This book highlights, through various case studies, how corporate governance has evolved in a number of countries around the world. The international cast of contributors, from varying professional backgrounds including academics, lawyers and company directors, focus on different regions around the globe, reflecting various ownership structures, legal systems, and political and cultural aspirations. Some of the case studies used include: Standard Life; Telecom Italia; and Eskom.

Chapter 2: Standard Life: A Study of One of the UK’s Oldest Institutional Investors

Christine A. Mallin

Subjects: business and management, corporate governance, international business, economics and finance, corporate governance, international business, money and banking, law - academic, corporate law and governance

Extract

Christine A. Mallin INTRODUCTION The wave of financial scandals and collapses around the world has highlighted the need for better corporate governance. In the UK, it was after the failures of Coloroll and Polly Peck that the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance was established in May 1991. The Committee published its report in 1992, and it became widely known as the Cadbury Report, after its Chair, Sir Adrian Cadbury. The Report is widely recognized as having set the foundations for a ‘best practice’ system of corporate governance, both in the UK and subsequently in many countries across the world which incorporated some or all of its recommendations into their own corporate governance codes. At its core, the Cadbury Report (1992) recommended that companies should appoint three independent non-executive directors, separate the roles of Chair and CEO, and have an audit committee and a remuneration committee. A nomination committee was identified as one possible way to ensure a transparent appointments process. There have been numerous reports elaborating on aspects of the Cadbury Report over the last decade or so, including Greenbury (1995), Hampel (1998), the Combined Code (1998), Turnbull (1999), Higgs (2003), Smith (2003), and most recently the revised Combined Code (2003). The various codes generally view institutional investors as having a responsibility to exercise their power and influence appropriately in the companies in which they invest. The Combined Code (2003) has two main parts: one on companies and one on institutional shareholders. The part on...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information