Transformational CEOs

Transformational CEOs

Leadership and Management Success in Japan

Kimio Kase, Francisco J. Sáez-Martínez and Hernán Riquelme

Transformational CEOs questions why some Japanese firms succeeded in the 1990s despite an economy that failed – regardless of the burst of the ‘bubble’ economy, a number of Japanese companies have maintained or extended their international leadership in particular sectors. The authors argue that whilst some of the reasons for successes are plain common sense – operational effectiveness and superior CEO leadership – some are Japan-specific and point to a break with traditional leadership rationale.

Chapter 4: Profit-Arithmetic Approach to Business

Kimio Kase, Francisco J. Sáez-Martínez and Hernán Riquelme

Subjects: asian studies, asian business, business and management, asia business, business leadership, international business, strategic management


1. INTRODUCTION In the previous chapter we explained one successful approach to business observed among outstanding CEOs1 in Japan, namely the proto-image of the firm (PIF) by reviewing Sony’s case supplemented with Yamato Transport’s. In this chapter we will explain a second approach: the profit-arithmetic (PA) approach. Our studies of how successful CEOs approach business decisions seem to indicate their schemata will emphasise (1) profit levers such as cost cutting, (2) daily operations rather than a long-term grand design, and (3) prioritysetting. CEOs whose business approach best exemplifies the characteristics of the PA approach are Shin-Etsu Chemicals’ Chihiro Kanagawa, and Nissan’s Carlos Ghosn. The analysis will therefore compare the approach of these two business leaders with a focus on the aforementioned three characteristics (points), namely, their use of profit levers, conduct of operations, and setting of priorities. For purposes of clarity we will break down the main concept into its three main characteristics. 2. PROFIT LEVERS 2.1 Kanagawa’s Case PA-type CEOs seem to pay more attention to the actual arithmetic of profit and to how to make individual managers act on the levers to produce the profit than to how each individual manager will behave. Charles Allen from UK’s Granada, for example, claimed he was a PVC fetishist (Campbell, 1998). He meant that he focused on price, volume and cost using them as key levers to run the business. Managers were expected to think deeply about how to improve all three levers.2 Much in the same vein, Shin-Etsu’s Kanagawa concentrates...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information