Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Competition Law

Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Competition Law

Elgar original reference

Edited by Josef Drexl

This comprehensive Handbook brings together contributions from American, Canadian, European, and Japanese writers to better explore the interface between competition and intellectual property law. Issues range from the fundamental to the specific, each considered from the angle of cartels, dominant positions, and mergers. Topics covered include, among others, technology licensing, the doctrine of exhaustion, network industries, innovation, patents, and copyright.

Chapter 3: The Contestability of IP-Protected Markets

Andreas Heinemann

Subjects: economics and finance, law and economics, law - academic, competition and antitrust law, intellectual property law, law and economics


Andreas Heinemann 1 Introduction IP protection and contestability? At first sight, this subject seems to be paradoxical: the very sense of an IPR is excluding others from the use of the protected knowledge. IPRs are granted in order to protect their owners from contestability. On the other hand, every IPR has a well-defined scope. It does not in itself confer market power or even dominance, but only gives exclusiveness over certain knowledge. Others keep the right to develop substitutes, to ‘invent around’ or to be active in neighbouring markets not covered by the exclusive right in question. Typically, it is in the interest of the IPR owner to make the most of her privilege. The fundamental problem consists in telling the difference between what is allowed and what is prohibited in this respect. Or to put it another way: how far does the scope of reward for an IPR go? This chapter will show that – under certain conditions – the owner of an IPR cannot make use of the whole spectrum of rights granted to her under IP legislation. The chapter will analyse which limits should be set to the freedom of an IPR holder. Even IP-protected markets have to stay open to a certain extent, not only in the long run, but also in the face of abusive short-term strategies. Restrictions on the freedom of the IPR holder are not only compatible with the model of dynamic competition and the promotion of innovation, but they are even required by these...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information