Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Competition Law

Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Competition Law

Elgar original reference

Edited by Josef Drexl

This comprehensive Handbook brings together contributions from American, Canadian, European, and Japanese writers to better explore the interface between competition and intellectual property law. Issues range from the fundamental to the specific, each considered from the angle of cartels, dominant positions, and mergers. Topics covered include, among others, technology licensing, the doctrine of exhaustion, network industries, innovation, patents, and copyright.

Chapter 11: Making Antitrust and Intellectual Property Policy in the United States: Requirements Tie-ins and Loyalty Discounts

Warren S. Grimes

Subjects: economics and finance, law and economics, law - academic, competition and antitrust law, intellectual property law, law and economics


Warren S. Grimes 1 Introduction Competition law and intellectual property (IP) law are at times complementary, at other times rivalrous. Finding the right policy balance is at once a formidable but vital task. At stake is achieving the right flow of IP incentives, a balance that encourages innovation without unduly undermining competition and the very innovation that IP is designed to promote. This chapter examines how antitrust policy that bears on intellectual property is established and enforced in the United States. It begins by describing the overarching debate concerning the proper reach and interpretation of intellectual property rights. It then describes US agencies and courts that play a major role in establishing competition policy. Finally, it examines two substantive areas, requirements tie-ins and loyalty discounts on strongly branded products, to gain greater perspective on whether the mechanisms for establishing IP-related competition law policy are working well. Because of the strong public-choice bias that favors creation and extension of IP rights, the broader public interest in competition and constraining overly broad IP protection is often under-represented. The interaction between IP and competition law works best when the two US antitrust enforcement agencies, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DoJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), are vigorous advocates for competition. 2 The debate concerning the reach of IP rights The antitrust and intellectual property debate has divided expert opinion in the United States. On one side of the issue are scholars, judges and policy makers who believe that more...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information