The Management of Intellectual Property

The Management of Intellectual Property

New Horizons in Intellectual Property series

Edited by Derek Bosworth and Elizabeth Webster

This book brings together innovative contributions on the management of intellectual property (IP) and intellectual property rights by an esteemed and multi-disciplinary group of economists, management scientists, accountants and lawyers.

Chapter 9: Innovation Scoreboards: An Australian Perspective

Paul H. Jensen and Alfons Palangkaraya

Subjects: business and management, knowledge management, economics and finance, intellectual property, innovation and technology, knowledge management, law - academic, intellectual property law


Paul H. Jensen and Alfons Palangkaraya 1 INTRODUCTION Innovation is generally recognized by economists as the ultimate engine of growth and prosperity. As Gans and Stern (2003, p. 7) state: ‘World class competitiveness and prosperity depends on … the ability to develop and commercialise “new-to-the-world” technologies, products and business organizations.’ This insight has spawned burgeoning interest in the analysis of innovation and its determinants at both the national level and the company level. While governments are typically interested in aggregate measures of innovation so that a nation’s performance can be benchmarked against others, it is at the firm level where most of the innovative activity actually occurs: firms take the risks involved in commercializing the inventions which ultimately drive the growth of the domestic economy. As a consequence, measurement of companies’ innovative performance has also received a lot of attention from academics, policy-makers and business analysts. However, measurement of innovation at either the national or company level is difficult for a number of reasons. First, an innovation (by its very definition) is something that is ‘new’, which makes it difficult to construct a measure of innovation which is general enough to be used to compare to other innovative outputs. Second, the innovation process typically takes many years and involves managing numerous risks. As a result, the relationship between inputs (such as R&D expenditure) and outputs (such as patents) is potentially non-linear and it is unclear how these factors can be accounted for in a single measure of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information