The Law and Economics of Globalisation

The Law and Economics of Globalisation

New Challenges for a World in Flux

Edited by Linda Yueh

This inter-disciplinary volume focuses on the economic and legal challenges confronting globalisation and the evolution of the global system. The Law and Economics of Globalisation discusses the hotly debated topic of globalisation from a wide set of perspectives of law, economics and international political economy.

Chapter 4: Negotiation or Litigation? The Curiously Evolving Governance of the WTO

Kamala Dawar and Peter Holmes

Subjects: economics and finance, international economics, law and economics, law - academic, international economic law, trade law, law and economics

Extract

Kamala Dawar and Peter Holmes INTRODUCTION Within five years of the creation of the WTO it was already becoming apparent that the institution’s stability was at risk because of an emerging imbalance in its constitution (Holmes 2001). The political decision-making capacity of the WTO was in paralysis while the judicial element in the form of the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) was proving to be remarkably successful. Within this set up were contained the seeds of major problems: an international body making decisions over some of the most sensitive international economic and political issues, including literally some life and death issues, with no political element, is a recipe for crisis. The 2001 Doha Round of negotiations was supposed to rectify this imbalance, but as is well known the talks have progressed extremely slowly. While there has been substantial progress on one area, TRIPS,1 the overall slow pace of WTO negotiations forms the backdrop to this paper. Jackson (2006: 4) observed ‘I think the [Dispute Settlement Body] is the most powerful of all the economic organizations that exist. A tension has developed between this dispute settlement system and the rest of the organization.’ This chapter continues to focus on this particular tension by examining how the DSB has reacted to its position within this imbalance – which is even more exposed than in 2001. The chapter argues that the Appellate Body has reacted politically, in a style intended to defuse some of the controversy it has generated. The thesis of this chapter...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information