Rethinking Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy

Rethinking Voluntary Approaches in Environmental Policy

Rory Sullivan

The book systematically analyses three initiatives (environmental management systems, the Australian Greenhouse Challenge and the Australian mining industry’s Code for Environmental Management) and their contribution to public environmental policy. By moving the debate away from narrow considerations of economic efficiency towards a broader framework that accounts for the multiple goals to which environmental policy needs to be directed, this book significantly enhances our understanding of the role that voluntary approaches can play in achieving environmental policy goals.

Chapter 5: Environmental Management Systems

Rory Sullivan

Subjects: business and management, management and sustainability, environment, environmental management

Extract

Even though environmental issues appeared on the Australian political agenda in the early 1970s, it was only in the early to mid-1980s that compliance with environmental legislation became a priority for Australian firms. Historically, common law in Australia had separated the acts of corporations from the acts of individuals working for the corporation, which meant that individuals could not be held responsible for the actions of a corporation. However, in the early to mid-1980s, the Australian states and territories all overhauled their environmental legislation to impose liability on both corporations and on corporate directors and managers for the offences of their corporations (Lipman and Bates, 2002: 180–211; Howard, 2000). The penalties which can now be imposed include significant fines for corporate entities and fines (typically up to A$250 000) and prison sentences (up to seven years) for individuals, and the directors and managers of firms can be prosecuted even if the firm has not been prosecuted. The general defences available to individuals are that the firm contravened the provision of the Act without their constructive knowledge, the person was not in a position to influence the actions of the firm or, if they were in a position of influence, they took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid the contravention (the issue of due diligence is discussed further below). There have also been changes in the approach of regulatory bodies to the enforcement of environmental legislation, with most of the states improving the funding of their regulatory...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information