Table of Contents

The Elgar Companion to Social Economics

The Elgar Companion to Social Economics

Elgar original reference

Edited by John B. Davis and Wilfred Dolfsma

As this comprehensive Companion demonstrates, social economics is a dynamic and growing field that emphasizes the key role that values play in the economy and in economic life. Social economics treats the economy and economics as being embedded in the larger web of social and ethical relationships. It also regards economics and ethics as essentially connected, and adds values such as justice, fairness, dignity, well-being, freedom and equality to the standard emphasis on efficiency. The Elgar Companion to Social Economics brings together the leading contributors in the field to elucidate a wide range of recent developments across different subject areas and topics. In so doing the contributors also map the likely trends and directions of future research. This Companion will undoubtedly become a leading reference source and guide to social economics for many years to come.

Chapter 21: Social Capital: A Critique and Extension

Nicolas Sirven

Subjects: economics and finance, methodology of economics, public sector economics, social policy and sociology, economics of social policy


Nicolas Sirven The concept of social capital has been widely used in the economic literature to assess issues on economic development (Isham et al., 2002; Grootaert and Van Bastelaer, 2002), health promotion (Hawe and Shiell, 2000; Almedom, 2005), or sustainable environmental governance (Pretty and Ward, 2001). Economists generally use ‘social capital’ to address a wide range of social phenomena that are believed to have an economic payoff. The hybrid nature of this concept raises interest, especially in social economics where the term ‘social capital’ seems to be used to mean anything one wants it to mean. However, comments in the economic literature are rather ambivalent about the usefulness of ‘social capital’. At least three main different opinions can be underlined. First, ‘social capital’ is thought to be an oxymoron, i.e. an awkward metaphor developed to gain conviction from a bad analogy (Solow, 1999; Arrow, 1999). The analysis of social phenomena in economics should thus be made without any reference to ‘capital’, a term that should be restricted to concepts as tangible as bricks and mortar (see, e.g., Dolfsma, 2001). Second, ‘social capital’ is seen as a Trojan horse that economists have built to colonize social science under the assumption of rationality (Fine and Green, 2000). Once again, the use of ‘social capital’ is contested because the undersocialized conception of homo economicus may introduce a distortion into the analysis of social behaviours (Granovetter, 1985). Third, a more optimistic view of ‘social capital’ makes it play the role of a ‘missing...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information