New Directions in Economic Geography

New Directions in Economic Geography

New Horizons in Regional Science series

Edited by Bernard Fingleton

This important book explores original and alternative directions for economic geography following the revolution precipitated by the advent of so-called ‘new economic geography’ (NEG). Whilst, to some extent, the volume could be regarded as part of the inevitable creative destruction of NEG theory, it does promote the continuing role of theoretical and empirical contributions within spatial economic analysis, in which the rationale of scientific analysis and economic logic maintain a central place. With contributions from leading experts in the field, the book presents a comprehensive analysis of the extent to which NEG theory is supported in the real world. By exploring whether NEG theory can be effectively applied to provide practical insights, the authors highlight novel approaches, emerging trends, and promising new lines of enquiry in the wake of advances made by NEG.

Chapter 3: Testing the ‘New Economic Geography’: A Comparative Analysis Based on EU Regional Data

Bernard Fingleton

Subjects: economics and finance, regional economics, urban economics, geography, economic geography, urban and regional studies, regional economics, urban economics


Bernard Fingleton 3.1 INTRODUCTION Interest in economic geography has been stimulated by the introduction of a formal general equilibrium ‘new economic geography’ (NEG) theory in which increasing returns to scale are an outcome of each agent solving a clearly defined economic problem within the context of a monopolistic competition market structure (Dixit and Stiglitz, 1977). Recents books, notably Fujita, Krugman and Venables (1999) and Brakman, Garretsen and van Marrewijk (2001), have helped to popularize these developments in geographical economics, and despite some cautious reactions (Neary, 2001), on the whole, NEG theorizing has been reasonably widely appreciated among the broader economics and regional science community, helping to establish at a formal level the role of increasing returns, which had long been seen as a key to understanding the spatial concentration of economic activity. Initially, theoretical developments were at the cutting edge of research activity, but more recently we have seen a growing literature aimed at operationalizing and testing NEG (see, for example, Combes and Lafourcade, 2001, 2004; Forslid, Haaland and Midelfart Knarvik, 2002; Combes and Overman, 2003; Head and Mayer, 2003; Rice and Venables, 2003; Redding and Venables, 2004). Among this literature is analysis relating to the so-called wage equation, which links nominal wages to market access or potential,1 and which was initially studied by Hanson (1997, 1998) and more latterly by Roos (2001), Brakman, Garretsen and Schramm (2002), Mion (2003) and Niebuhr (2004). The present chapter also follows this strand of analysis. This recent rigorous empirical work has...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information