Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy

Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy

Elgar original reference

Edited by David B. Audretsch, Isabel Grilo and A. Roy Thurik

This unique Handbook provides a solid foundation for essential study in the nascent field of entrepreneurship policy research. This foundation is initially developed via the exploration of two significant propositions underpinning the nature of entrepreneurship policy research. The first is that entrepreneurship has emerged as a bona fide focus of public policy, particularly with respect to economic growth and employment creation. The second is that neither scholars nor policy makers are presently equipped to understand the public policy role for entrepreneurship.

Chapter 5: Promoting Entrepreneurship in the Welfare State

Magnus Henrekson and Jesper Roine

Subjects: business and management, entrepreneurship


* Magnus Henrekson and Jesper Roine Introduction Over the past decades endogenous growth theory has developed models that come closer to making explicit what drives long-term economic development. More specifically, explicit incentives for innovation have been included so as to explain why individuals would engage in creating new technologies and better ways of producing goods and services (see Barro and Sala-i-Martin, 1995; Aghion and Howitt, 1998). However, the actual agents of change, the entrepreneurs, are still defined rather narrowly and theory does not capture the wide-ranging and complex functions suggested outside mainstream economics (see for example Glancey and McQuaid, 2000; Swedberg, 2000; and Bianchi and Henrekson, 2005). Typically theories of endogenous growth emphasize the (expected) pay-offs from innovation or, more generally, the gains from the activities that improve production and organization. Consequently, taxes and benefits that reduce the incentives for engaging in such activities, or policies that decrease their return, should be expected to reduce growth. It is commonly thought that the welfare state’s large marginal tax wedges reduce incentives to save and accumulate capital, ultimately discouraging innovation. If this is the case, the welfare state should have less innovation and consequently less growth. However, the disincentive effects from taxes could be countered by spending on growth-enhancing activities such as schooling, infrastructure, or well functioning institutions. It is also possible – as was pointed out by Steinmo (1993) and Lindert (2004), among others – that taxes in a welfare state can be raised in ways that are more...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information