Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy

Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy

Elgar original reference

Edited by David B. Audretsch, Isabel Grilo and A. Roy Thurik

This unique Handbook provides a solid foundation for essential study in the nascent field of entrepreneurship policy research. This foundation is initially developed via the exploration of two significant propositions underpinning the nature of entrepreneurship policy research. The first is that entrepreneurship has emerged as a bona fide focus of public policy, particularly with respect to economic growth and employment creation. The second is that neither scholars nor policy makers are presently equipped to understand the public policy role for entrepreneurship.

Chapter 12: Issues in Evaluation: The Case of Shell Livewire

Francis J. Green and David J. Storey

Subjects: business and management, entrepreneurship

Extract

Francis J. Greene and David J. Storey Introduction Enterprise policy is predicated on the basis that it is possible to alter the behaviour of people. Prior to such interventions, some people may be unaware of their entrepreneurial potential, shy of their entrepreneurial capability or feel intimidated by their inability to fund their entrepreneurial ambitions. Enterprise policy, if successful, should resolve some or all of these limitations. Unfortunately, while enterprise policy is widespread across developed economies there is little evaluation of impact. Even where there has been evaluation (e.g. Lerner, 1999 and Wallsten, 2000 (US’s SBIR programme); and del Monte and Scalera, 2001 (Italy’s Law 44 programme); Riding and Haines, 2001 (loan guarantee schemes); Wren and Storey, 2002 (consultancy support); and Chrisman, 1989, 1999; Chrisman and Katrishen, 1994; and Chrisman and McMullan, 2000, 2004 (US Small Business Development Centers)), we still often don’t know what does work and what does not (Lundström and Stevenson, 2001). This chapter begins by discussing some of the issues faced in evaluating enterprise programmes. It suggests that the optimal evaluation techniques, if we wish to accurately specify the additionality of programmes, is to use matched samples of the ‘treated’ and the ‘unwashed’ and then subsequently use econometric techniques to account for their observable and unobservable characteristics (e.g. Heckman, 1979; Heckman and Smith, 1996), so as to accurately measure policy impact. The discussion then moves on to suggesting that besides the comfort of knowing that our hard-earned euros, dollars or pounds are well accounted for, programme...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information