Table of Contents

The WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights

The WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights

A Commentary

Elgar Commentaries series

Justin Malbon, Charles Lawson and Mark Davison

This Commentary on the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) provides a detailed textual analysis of TRIPS – a pivotal international agreement on intellectual property rights. TRIPS sets minimum standards for national laws on copyright, patents, trademarks and other forms of intellectual property rights. TRIPS profoundly impacts upon the regulation of access to medicines, compulsory licensing of copyright material, geographical indicators and other significant IP-related matters.

Section 1 COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS

Justin Malbon, Charles Lawson and Mark Davison

Subjects: law - academic, intellectual property law, law -professional, intellectual property law, politics and public policy, international relations

Extract

The copyright and related rights protection conferred by this section is based on and adopts much of the protection provided by two pre-existing WIPO treaties. They are the Berne Convention (1971) that protects literary and artistic works, and the Rome Convention that protects phonograms and performers. Different jurisdictions treat rights in relation to phonograms and performances differently. Some incorporate those rights into copyright while others treat them as related or neighbouring rights. These differences in approach have implications for the drafting of the relevant TRIPS provisions with an apparent intention to ensure neutrality in approach so that respective jurisdictions may maintain their differing approaches while complying with the minimum standards of TRIPS. One of the difficulties with interpretation of the various sections is the extent to which they are or are not consistent with the Berne and Rome Conventions. Article 9, which incorporates the major provisions of the Berne Convention (1971), has been the subject of interpretation by the Panel in US – Section 110(5) of US Copyright Act. The Panel’s interpretation process was, in one sense, made easier by the specific reference to the Berne Convention (1971) with the consequent decision that the jurisprudence surrounding the interpretation of Berne is also part of the interpretation of the relevant provisions of TRIPS. However, there are still outstanding issues of interpretation where there is some conflict between the TRIPS provisions and Berne, or, at the least, some ambiguity as to the relationship between the two.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information