Table of Contents

The WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights

The WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights

A Commentary

Elgar Commentaries series

Justin Malbon, Charles Lawson and Mark Davison

This Commentary on the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) provides a detailed textual analysis of TRIPS – a pivotal international agreement on intellectual property rights. TRIPS sets minimum standards for national laws on copyright, patents, trademarks and other forms of intellectual property rights. TRIPS profoundly impacts upon the regulation of access to medicines, compulsory licensing of copyright material, geographical indicators and other significant IP-related matters.

Section 5 PATENTS

Justin Malbon, Charles Lawson and Mark Davison

Subjects: law - academic, intellectual property law, law -professional, intellectual property law, politics and public policy, international relations


In the TRIPS context, a patent is essentially a utilitarian economic measure to address a perceived problem in the failure of functioning markets to promote useful inventions. Narratives describing the TRIPS negotiations of patent measures provide some insight into what may have been intended, but the outcome was to establish a number of basic minimum standards, limited exemptions and exceptions, as well as a prohibition against discriminating between different places of invention, fields of technology and importation. This left Members to determine the details of their domestic patent schemes. The TRIPS patent minimum standards essentially reflect the existing patent schemes among developed Members at the time of the negotiations. The effective harmonisation of these minimum patent standards was probably pursued in TRIPS because of the perceived failure of the Paris Convention (1967) to adequately delineate the scope of patentable subject matter and obligations. TRIPS does, however, incorporate elements of the Paris Convention (1967), with the effect that Members’ patent-related obligations are determined by their complicity with both the minimum standards of TRIPS and those incorporated by TRIPS from the Paris Convention (1967). However, TRIPS does not fully deal with patent harmonisation or establish each element required for a comprehensive domestic patent scheme. Many controversies remain about different approaches to patent regulation among Members. While TRIPS may be a significant advance in patent standards, it is by no means the final word.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information