Table of Contents

The WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights

The WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights

A Commentary

Elgar Commentaries series

Justin Malbon, Charles Lawson and Mark Davison

This Commentary on the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) provides a detailed textual analysis of TRIPS – a pivotal international agreement on intellectual property rights. TRIPS sets minimum standards for national laws on copyright, patents, trademarks and other forms of intellectual property rights. TRIPS profoundly impacts upon the regulation of access to medicines, compulsory licensing of copyright material, geographical indicators and other significant IP-related matters.

Section 8 CONTROL OF ANTI-COMPETITIVE PRACTICES IN CONTRACTUAL LICENCES

Justin Malbon, Charles Lawson and Mark Davison

Subjects: law - academic, intellectual property law, law -professional, intellectual property law, politics and public policy, international relations

Extract

Article 40 and Article 8.2 were included to address the particular concerns of developing and least developed Members about the exercise of intellectual property in the TRIPS negotiations.1 Article 8.2 specifically addressed abuses and restrictions against trade and technology transfer, while Article 40 is concerned with anti-competitive licensing practices. More specifically, Article 40.1 acknowledges that intellectual property licensing may be anti-competitive and Article 40.2 enables Members to make laws prohibiting the anti- competitive licensing of intellectual property, so long as those laws are consistent with TRIPS and appropriate to prevent or control such practices. In addition to this, Article 40.3 and 40.4 provide a procedure between Members to resolve differences about the alleged treatment of their national’s or domicile’s intellectual property under another Member’s competition laws addressing licences. Through Article 40 and Article 8.2, a significant avenue is provided to limit the exercise of intellectual property, balancing the particular interests of a Member to adopt different economic goals with different strategies for achieving those goals. Other related provisions that also address competition concerns are TRIPS Articles 6, 31(k) and 39.1 and the Paris Convention (1967) Articles 5A(2) and 10bis, providing the grounds to limit the exercise of IP rights by their owners. As Members seek to adopt technological development, they require the transfer and dissemination of technology, mostly from more developed Members and most often subject to intellectual property. This technology will depend on licensing to achieve that transfer and dissemination.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information