Table of Contents

Regionalism, Trade and Economic Development in the Asia-Pacific Region

Regionalism, Trade and Economic Development in the Asia-Pacific Region

Edited by M. A.B. Siddique

This book is based on the premise that Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) in the Asia-Pacific significantly impact on the material progress of the peoples of this region. These impacts – in terms of the benefits and costs associated with RTAs – will vary greatly from country to country. The internationally acclaimed contributors examine the theoretical perspective of RTAs in relation to exchange rates, the role and goals of the WTO and agriculture.

Chapter 1: Regionalism, Trade and Economic Development: Theories and Evidence from the Asia-Pacific Region

M.A.B. Siddique

Subjects: asian studies, asian development, asian economics, development studies, asian development, economics and finance, asian economics, international economics, regional economics, urban and regional studies, regional economics

Extract

1. Regionalism, trade and economic development: theories and evidence from the Asia-Pacific region M.A.B. Siddique INTRODUCTION Regional trade agreements (RTAs) are formed with the aim of minimizing trade barriers in order to increase the flow of total trade between the participating countries. RTAs bring the signatory countries one step closer to establishing a global village with fewer trade barriers. The main arguments put forward in favour of establishing RTAs are based on the theory of comparative advantage (initially developed by Adam Smith in 1776) to bring about an increased standard of living, increased employment, increased global understanding and so on. There are two main geographical facets of RTAs: regional, for example the North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA); and bilateral, such as the Singapore–Australia Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA). By November 2005 there were also three types of RTAs in force. These were free trade agreements (FTAs), which make up 84 per cent, customs unions (CUs); and partial scope agreements, which both account for 8 per cent (Crawford and Fiorentino 2005, p. 3). FTAs have zero tariffs between member countries and each country retains the ability for independent trade policy with the rest of the world. CUs are FTAs with members imposing common tariffs on non-members. This loss of independent trade policy is the likely reason for the prevalence of FTAs over CUs. Partial scope agreements have limited liberalization which dampens their appeal. RTAs inspire much debate between trade economists, business communities and politicians. Unfortunately, there is...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information