Economic Growth

Economic Growth

New Directions in Theory and Policy

Edited by Phillip Arestis, Michelle Baddeley and John S.L. McCombie

This enlightening and significant volume focuses on the nature, causes and features of economic growth across a wide range of countries and regions. Covering a variety of growth related topics – from theoretical analyses of economic growth in general to empirical analyses of growth in the OECD, transition economies and developing economies – the distinguished cast of contributors addresses some of the most important contemporary issues and developments in the field.

Chapter 5: The Representative Firm and Increasing Returns: Then and Now

Stephanie Blankenberg and G.C. Harcourt

Subjects: economics and finance, post-keynesian economics


5. The representative firm and increasing returns: then and now Stephanie Blankenburg and G.C. Harcourt I There is something archaic, yet modern about the tone and issues of the 1920s debates in the Economic Journal on the representative firm and increasing returns, often referred to as ‘the cost controversy’. Then, as now, applied economists, ‘realitics’, Sir John Clapham called them, and theoretical economists (‘analytics’) were often poles apart, who neither properly understood or appreciated each other’s roles and approaches. Then, as now, views differed on whether or not theory had to be directly applicable in explanations of ‘real world’ observations, and much misunderstanding occurred because the separation between logically coherent ‘high theory’ in its own domain and, a separate issue, its direct applicability, was not made by protagonists. Or, one side would be concerned with the former, the other with the latter, neither making this understanding explicit. For this, Marshall must take much blame. Though the distinction was clear to him, in the arguments of his Principles it is purposefully blurred because he wished to be read by businessmen (sic). Its text often reads as a narrative about real-life happenings, admittedly explicitly confined mostly to normal periods but meant to call up in readers’ minds their own observations and experiences. Yet Marshall’s powerful theoretical mind provided an underlying but hidden structure, confined to footnotes and appendices, of explicitly set out theoretical pre-suppositions and arguments. It took the same subtlety of mind (and foxiness of character) as Marshall’s...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information