Economic Growth

Economic Growth

New Directions in Theory and Policy

Edited by Phillip Arestis, Michelle Baddeley and John S.L. McCombie

This enlightening and significant volume focuses on the nature, causes and features of economic growth across a wide range of countries and regions. Covering a variety of growth related topics – from theoretical analyses of economic growth in general to empirical analyses of growth in the OECD, transition economies and developing economies – the distinguished cast of contributors addresses some of the most important contemporary issues and developments in the field.

Chapter 9: The Relevance of the Cambridge–Cambridge Controversies in Capital Theory for Econometric Practice

G.C. Harcourt

Subjects: economics and finance, post-keynesian economics


G.C. Harcourt* I There is a well-known tale of the mathematician who used to burst into tears at the sight of the binomial theorem ‘because it was so beautiful’. I have had occasion to remark that, for the same reason, economists at least get lumps in their throats at the sight of the Cobb–Douglas production function because it has such beautiful properties: the exponents of K and L measure the respective shares of profits and wages in the national income; the marginal products of K and L measure the return to capital and the wage-rate; the marginal products themselves relate in a very simple way – proportionally, where the factors of proportionality have clear economic meaning – to their respective average products.1 Moreover, in growth theory the Cobb–Douglas allows simple measures of the contributions to growth in income per head of the respective growth in capital and labour. That is why, apart from Australian chauvinism/patriotism, I prefer Swan (1956) to Solow (1956). Trevor Swan’s algebra and diagrams neatly exploit the above properties (and more) to illuminate the processes being analysed and, in particular, show why competitive markets give out stabilising signals which guide Harrod’s warranted rate of growth towards equality with his natural rate of growth by affecting the choice of technique (as reflected in capital–output ratios). And when technical progress is included, as Solow (1957) showed, manipulation of the basic equations allows us to get simple measures of the respective contributions of deepening and (disembodied)...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information