Table of Contents

Trademark Law and Theory

Trademark Law and Theory

A Handbook of Contemporary Research

Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property series

Edited by Graeme B. Dinwoodie and Mark D. Janis

This important research Handbook brings together a set of illuminating works by the field’s leading scholars to comprise one of the broadest and most far-reaching overviews of trademark law issues. Organized around three areas of inquiry, the book starts by offering a rich variety of methodological perspectives on trademark law. Reflecting the multifaceted nature of contemporary trademarks, contributors have drawn from law and economics, political science, semiotic theory, and history. The Handbook goes on to survey trademark law’s international landscape, addressing indigenous cultural property, human rights issues, the free movement of goods, and the role of substantive harmonization. It concludes with a series of forward-looking perspectives, which focus on trademark law’s intersection with the laws of advertising and free speech, copyright law, cyberspace regulation, and design protection.

Section B: Limiting the Scope of Trademark Rights

Edited by Graeme B. Dinwoodie and Mark D. Janis

Subjects: law - academic, intellectual property law


12 Restricting allusion to trade marks: a new justification Michael Spence* I. Introduction The scope of an intellectual property right should reflect its justification: the assistance of state power ought only to be available if those subject to that power can be offered a reasoned account for its exercise. This principle is a vital check on arbitrary government and means that the intellectual property systems, even if in fact they are the product of historical contingency, must be explained and developed in ways that reflect consistent and coherent purposes. In the context of trade mark, protection of a trader against the use of signs that might be confused with her trade mark is relatively easy to justify. First, to persist in using a potentially confusing sign is to engage in a type of deliberate deception. The circumstances in which deliberate deception is wrong are something about which moral philosophers are apt to disagree. But none would condone deception for the purpose of profit at the expense of another person, and it is of this that trade mark infringement involving likely consumer confusion is exemplary. Second, causing consumer confusion has undesirable economic consequences. An important function of trade marks is to reduce consumer search costs, and to maintain the incentive that a producer has both to invest in product quality and to supply goods at the lowest possible price. This is especially the case with “experience” goods, those which a consumer must try in order to determine whether they meet her...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information