Table of Contents

Innovation, Evolution and Economic Change

Innovation, Evolution and Economic Change

New Ideas in the Tradition of Galbraith

New Directions in Modern Economics series

Edited by Blandine Laperche, James K. Galbraith and Dimitri Uzunidis

The book begins with a penetrating analysis of the main features of today’s capitalism and in particular the conflict between shareholders and managers. It moves on to focus on the consequences of globalization in the decision-making processes of large corporations and represents an important step in the development of a theory of fraud and corruption within corporations. In the final part, the authors address and explore the consequences of the domination of influential groups over major social and political decisions, on the blurred boundaries between the public and the private sectors and its consequences in the fields of technological regulation and the evolution of public services. In so doing, the authors question the meaning and power of democracy in today’s society.

Chapter 12: Knowledge and Innovation: Power and Counterpower

Andrée Kartchevsky and Muriel Maillefert

Subjects: economics and finance, economic psychology, economics of innovation, history of economic thought, innovation and technology, economics of innovation


Andrée Kartchevsky and Muriel Maillefert The idea that people could one day consume less, work less and live more might seem puzzling. And nevertheless … J.K. Galbraith, 1971 1. INTRODUCTION The economic tradition radically opposes the state and the market, the market and organizations, the former regulating and mitigating possible market failures and the latter representing an alternative in the coordination of economic activities. This view, widely accepted by economic theory during the growth years, is not exactly the one held by Galbraith. This author, without denying the virtues or the shortcomings of the market, does not concede Keynesian economic policies the advantages they are traditionally granted. Thus Galbraith’s heterodoxy is opposed to the liberal discourse as well as to the interventionist solutions applied during the 1970s. Likewise, Galbraith, in contrast to Schumpeter, presents organizations as an endogenous element to the economy. According to Galbraith, organizations are the market and make the market, even if alongside an organized world exists a quasi-competitive universe in which small enterprises operate. In this chapter, we will first study how the organization – the technostructure in the heart of big corporations – exercizes its power on the content, the direction and therefore on change in industrial capitalism. This leads to the subordination of markets and the fields of public action to the requirements of influential groups. This context gives scientists specific roles and responsibilities. With Galbraith, in the second part, we will study the sense of innovation and technical change in the capitalism of big enterprises,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information