Table of Contents

The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics

The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics

Elgar original reference

Edited by Peter G. Klein and Michael E. Sykuta

Since its emergence in the 1970s, transaction cost economics (TCE) has become a leading approach in the research on contracts, firm organization and strategy, antitrust, marketing, inter-firm collaboration and entrepreneurship. With contributions by leading scholars in economics, law and business administration – including Oliver E. Williamson, recipient of the 2009 Nobel Prize in economics for his development of the transaction cost approach – this volume reviews the latest developments in TCE and applies them to contemporary theoretical and empirical problems.

Chapter 23: The Chicago School, Transaction Cost Economics, and Antitrust

Joshua D. Wright

Subjects: economics and finance, industrial economics, industrial organisation


Joshua D. Wright John Roberts’ reign at the US Supreme Court is only in its nascent stages. Already, however, its antitrust activity level has exceeded the Court’s single case average prior to the 2003–04 Term by a significant margin. This flurry of antitrust activity, combined with an apparent willingness to reconsider long-established precedents that conflict with modern antitrust theory, suggests that the Supreme Court will play a relatively significant role in shaping antitrust doctrine for years to come. In the four decades prior to the Roberts Court’s first Term, antitrust jurisprudence could be summarily, but accurately, described as slowly but surely absorbing the insights of the Chicago school and the transaction cost approach: per se prohibitions against vertical restraints gave way to rule-of-reason analysis, the per se rule against tying was softened, hostility to vertical integration and predatory pricing all but disappeared, and the law incorporated a more sophisticated understanding of the procompetitive uses of exclusive dealing contracts. As courts increasingly incorporated the lessons of the Chicago school and transaction cost contributions of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, the hostility toward various business practices was relaxed in favour of a rule-of-reason approach that placed evidentiary burdens on plaintiffs to demonstrate these practices would generate anticompetitive effects (Wright, 2007a). Identifying the economic influences underlying a series of court decisions is a difficult task. But that task is rendered impossible without some guidelines as to what the author intends when he claims that a particular set of decisions is influenced by...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information