Table of Contents

Impact Assessment and Sustainable Development

Impact Assessment and Sustainable Development

European Practice and Experience

Evaluating Sustainable Development series

Edited by Clive George and Colin Kirkpatrick

Translation of the principle of sustainable development into policy and practice, and the evaluation of the outcomes of these strategic interventions, are some of the most pressing challenges facing policymakers in Europe and beyond. The chapters in this book contribute to the debate surrounding these challenges. By exploring the conceptual and methodological issues relating to the evaluation of sustainable development and analysing European practice and experience, this work provides a coherent and integrated contribution to our understanding of these issues.

Chapter 6: Considering Environmental Aspects in Integrated Impact Assessment: Lessons Learned and Challenges Ahead

Klaus Jacob, Julia Hertin and Axel Volkery

Subjects: economics and finance, environmental economics, public sector economics, valuation, environment, environmental economics, valuation, politics and public policy, public policy


Klaus Jacob, Julia Hertin and Axel Volkery1 I. INTRODUCTION The tool of impact assessments (IAs) has steadily gained attention throughout the last years.2 Whereas in the 1980s only a few countries had introduced procedures for regulatory impact assessment, it diffused more rapidly throughout the 1990s amongst OECD countries (Radaelli 2004, 2005). Initially, the main concern was to minimize costs for business actors and to increase transparency of rule making (OECD 1997). Over the last five years or so, there have been efforts to integrate several sectoral assessments into one overall integrated procedure (European Commission 2002). This development is driven on the one hand by the concern for implementing the ‘better regulation’ agenda. On the other hand, IA is also promoted to address the requirements of sustainable development. Both agendas require a better integration and coherence of policies, and IA is considered as a key tool to accomplish this task. The new impetus for integrated IA has been met with great interest and expectations from the environmental side since integrated IA appears to offer a new way of strengthening environmental policy integration. However, there are also many critics who fear a sidelining of the environmental agenda due to the obvious tensions with the better regulation agenda (Volkery and Jacob 2005). This chapter compares IA systems in Canada, the EU, the Netherlands, the UK, Australia, Italy and the US, exploring how the different systems work, which functions they have, how they are situated within the political process and...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information