Table of Contents

Frontier Issues in Ecological Economics

Frontier Issues in Ecological Economics

Philip Lawn

Ecological economics formally emerged in the late 1980s in response to the failure of mainstream economic paradigms to deal adequately with the interdependence of social, economic and ecological systems. Frontier Issues in Ecological Economics focuses on a range of cutting-edge issues in the field of ecological economics and outlines plausible measures to achieve a more sustainable, just, and efficient world for all.

Chapter 3: Is Human-Made Capital an Adequate Long-run Substitute for Natural Capital?

Philip Lawn

Subjects: development studies, development economics, economics and finance, development economics, environment, ecological economics


INTRODUCTION Consideration of the critical role played by natural capital is not a recent phenomenon. Concern about impending resource scarcity was expressed as far back as 1798 by Thomas Malthus (Malthus, 1798 [1926]). Since then, the economic importance of natural capital has been revisited many times. Perhaps the first large-scale empirical analysis was undertaken by Barnett and Morse (1963). Using the unit cost of extractive resource output as a principal measure of resource scarcity, Barnett and Morse concluded that natural resources generally became more plentiful in the USA over the period 1870 to 1957.1 Without trying to deny the significance of Barnett and Morse’s contribution, Smith (1978) later revealed the theoretical and empirical limitations of their approach. Similar criticism emerged elsewhere raising serious doubts about the use of resource prices and unit extraction costs as resource scarcity indexes (e.g., Daly, 1979 and 1996; Brown and Field, 1979; V.K. Smith, 1979; Slade, 1982; Hall and Hall, 1984; Norgaard, 1990; Bishop, 1993; Lawn, 2000). Following the ‘limits to growth’ concerns in the late 1960s and early 1970s, two alternative approaches were undertaken to reassess the importance of natural capital in sustaining real output – one by Meadows et al. (1972) and another by Nordhaus and Tobin (1972). In what is often referred to as the Club of Rome Report, Meadows et al. employed ‘doomsday models’ to investigate the ecological limits to growth and the potential for technological change to remove such limits. They concluded that, left unchecked, humankind would soon deplete the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information