Table of Contents

Frontier Issues in Ecological Economics

Frontier Issues in Ecological Economics

Philip Lawn

Ecological economics formally emerged in the late 1980s in response to the failure of mainstream economic paradigms to deal adequately with the interdependence of social, economic and ecological systems. Frontier Issues in Ecological Economics focuses on a range of cutting-edge issues in the field of ecological economics and outlines plausible measures to achieve a more sustainable, just, and efficient world for all.

Chapter 4: The Potential Conflict Between Sustainability and Welfare Maximisation

Philip Lawn

Subjects: development studies, development economics, economics and finance, development economics, environment, ecological economics


4. The potential conflict between sustainability and welfare maximisation INTRODUCTION The previous chapter showed that the long-run output potential of the economic process has been overstated as a consequence of the mainstream use of aggregate production functions that violate the first and second laws of thermodynamics. A Bergstrom production function (BPF) was subsequently put forward as an alternative means of describing production or resource-transforming possibilities. Use of the BPF revealed that natural and human-made capital are effectively complementary rather than substitutable forms of capital. Unfortunately, the BPF, alone, is unable to indicate the likely pattern of natural capital depletion should a society wish to continuously increase its level of production and consumption over time. In order to fully appreciate the long-run production possibilities of an economic system, a time dimension must be incorporated into the BPF. In addition, assumptions must be made about the nature of both natural and human-made capital and the technology embodied within the latter. This is precisely what is undertaken in this chapter. Furthermore, the revised BPF is employed to conduct a range of simulation exercises. The simulation exercises reveal a number of important results and conclusions, none more so than: (a) the potential conflict that can arise between maximising present value welfare and the need to maintain natural capital for future generations, and (b) the critical role played in this conflict by the prevailing discount rate. Why might discounting conflict with natural capital maintenance and the ecological sustainability goal? An...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information