Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography

Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography

Edited by Koen Frenken

Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography aims to further advance empirical methodologies in evolutionary economics, with a special emphasis on geography and firm location. It does so by bringing together a select group of leading scholars including economists, geographers and sociologists, all of whom share an interest in explaining the uneven distribution of economic activities in space and the historical processes that have produced these patterns.

Chapter 9: Social Networks and the Economics of Networks

Daniel Birke

Subjects: economics and finance, economics of innovation, evolutionary economics, geography, economic geography, innovation and technology, economics of innovation

Extract

Daniel Birke* 1. INTRODUCTION The work by Arthur (1989) and the other literature on path dependence are prominent in many evolutionary arguments. Path dependence arises in increasing return technologies and describes the property that for many technologies, historically small events can have a profound and lasting impact on the development path of technologies. It is well understood that technologies with increasing returns can exhibit multiple equilibria and that these equilibria can often be local rather than global optima. Causes for increasing returns can be learning and network effects. The models of path dependence, however, have been based on rather simple assumptions about the choice behaviour of consumers in markets with network effects. The empirical question remains: how do consumers choose between rival products in a market with network effects? Consumers interact with other consumers in a variety of ways. Information about products and services is often spread by word of mouth and individuals are more likely to choose a product about which they have heard from a friend or which they have tried out with the help of a friend. In many cases, consumers also try to associate themselves with their peer group by consuming similar goods, try to imitate consumption behaviour of groups which they regard as having higher ‘social status’ and try to distinguish themselves from groups with lower ‘social status’ (see Cowan et al., 1997). Network effects have been treated in the literature mainly as an only positive peer effect, where every...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information