Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography

Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography

Edited by Koen Frenken

Applied Evolutionary Economics and Economic Geography aims to further advance empirical methodologies in evolutionary economics, with a special emphasis on geography and firm location. It does so by bringing together a select group of leading scholars including economists, geographers and sociologists, all of whom share an interest in explaining the uneven distribution of economic activities in space and the historical processes that have produced these patterns.

Chapter 10: Diversity, Stability and Regional Growth in the United States, 1975–2002

Jürgen Essletzbichler

Subjects: economics and finance, economics of innovation, evolutionary economics, geography, economic geography, innovation and technology, economics of innovation


Jürgen Essletzbichler* 1. INTRODUCTION Recent years have witnessed important changes in economic governance systems represented as a scalar shift of economic and political power from national states to supra-national entities and subnational entities such as cities and regions (Jessop, 1990, 1994; Brenner, 1998, 2004; Scott, 1998). Cities, regions and city-regions are increasingly forced into direct competition with each other that prompts regional policy makers to actively design and shape regional economic development (Harvey, 1989; Leitner and Sheppard, 1998). Baden-Württemberg, the Third Italy and Silicon Valley exemplify the paradigmatic model of economic development that other regions attempt to emulate (Bartik, 1996). Regional policies are designed to attract clusters of functionally related industries with high growth potential although the value of cluster-based policies is not uncontested (Hudson, 1999; Lovering, 1999; Begg, 2002; Martin and Sunley, 2003; Boschma, 2004; Kitson et al., 2004). Duranton and Puga (2000: 533) caution that many of these policies seem to ‘lack a clear rationale or even to be based on common misconceptions’. The value of industrial specialization for regional economic development is uncertain as theoretical and empirical work on specialization and diversity of cities suggests (Baldwin et al., 2003; Black and Henderson, 2003; Duranton and Puga, 2000, 2001; Feldman and Audretsch, 1999; Henderson, 1997; Henderson et al., 1995). In particular, there appears to be a trade-off between growth and stability of regional economies that is largely ignored by policy makers (Baldwin and Brown, 2004). This chapter examines the relationship among diversity, growth and stability of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information