Deregulation and its Discontents

Deregulation and its Discontents

Rewriting the Rules in Asia

Edited by M. Ramesh and Michael Howlett

Deregulation and its Discontents examines the different ways in which the issues related to deregulation and reregulation have been addressed in Asia. The role of government in business has gone through distinct, if overlapping, cycles: regulation, deregulation and reregulation. However, little is known about deregulation and even less about reregulation, particularly in relation to Asia. The contributors to this book examine the links between the cycles through detvailed analyses of the electricity market, pensions and stock markets in the Asia Pacific. They also offer an explanation of regulatory cycles.

Chapter 6: Independent Power Producers in Indonesia and the Philippines

Xun Wu and Priyambudi Sulistiyanto

Subjects: asian studies, asian economics, asian politics and policy, economics and finance, asian economics, public sector economics, politics and public policy, asian politics, social policy and sociology, economics of social policy


Xun Wu and Priyambudi Sulistiyanto After decades of state monopoly on electricity production, in the early 1990s private sector participation in electricity generation through Independent Power Producer (IPP) was perceived as an inevitable policy option to deal with severe power shortages in several Southeast Asian countries (Haggard and Noble 2001; Dubash 2002). This initiative was encouraged and facilitated by development agencies that considered it an important step toward deregulation and privatization of the power sector. It was argued that IPP would not only relieve governments from the financial burden of capacity expansion in the power sector, but also lead to more competition, higher efficiency, and ultimately, lower electricity rate for consumers. Calls for the participation of private investors in electricity generation were met with great enthusiasm in Southeast Asia. Private investors, especially the utility companies from the US and Europe, acted quickly to take advantage of this opportunity, pouring billions of dollars into electricity generation for Southeast Asian countries. By 1997, when the region was hit by the Asian financial crisis, 27 IPP contracts in Indonesia had been signed between Perusahaan Umum Listrik Negara (PLN), the state-owned electricity company, and private investors. In the Philippines, agreements for 37 IPPs, accounting for 40 percent of the generation capacity of the country, had been reached. Other Southeast Asian countries such as Malaysia and Thailand also experienced similar growth in IPP during the period. However, the boom collapsed abruptly during the Asian financial crisis. Suddenly, the state-owned electricity companies in these countries found...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information