Table of Contents

Handbook of Economics and Ethics

Handbook of Economics and Ethics

Elgar original reference

Edited by Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren

The Handbook of Economics and Ethics portrays an understanding of economic methodology in which facts and values, though distinct, are closely interconnected in a variety of ways. From theory building to data collection, and from modelling to policy evaluation, this encyclopaedic Handbook is at the intersection of economics and ethics.

Chapter 14: Economic Anthropology

Jeffrey H. Cohen

Subjects: economics and finance, behavioural and experimental economics, history of economic thought


Jeffrey H. Cohen Economic anthropology might seem at some level an odd title for a field. Perhaps it is neither completely economic nor entirely anthropological. Certainly, economic anthropologists have been described as posers by their critics; not fully understanding the implications of economic theory nor embracing the ethnographic realities of anthropological research. Yet a second and more satisfying way to think about economic anthropology is as a field that borrows from economic theory while applying anthropological practices to understand the human dimensions of economic behaviour, this most social of processes (see Herkovits’s original statement [1940] 1965). The roots of economic anthropology, in fact, lie in bridging economic and anthropological concerns. As can be imagined, such bridge building has come with a great deal of conflict and debate concerning what constitutes ‘the economy’ for a given group. Debates among economic anthropologists have raged concerning how we define the economy, how we approach economic motivations and how we can best explain the social and cultural basis of economic practices. Early work in anthropology sought to understand the economics of people who were assumed to live well outside the market systems, capitalist frameworks and rational actions that define Western economic practices. This research was informed not by concerns for economic processes, but rather by the assumption that anthropologists would encounter some form of production, systems of exchange and consumption regardless of the society or culture studied. Paul Bohannon (quoted in Dalton 1961, p. 12) described the situation as follows: ‘the anthropologist is not...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information