Table of Contents

Handbook of Economics and Ethics

Handbook of Economics and Ethics

Elgar original reference

Edited by Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren

The Handbook of Economics and Ethics portrays an understanding of economic methodology in which facts and values, though distinct, are closely interconnected in a variety of ways. From theory building to data collection, and from modelling to policy evaluation, this encyclopaedic Handbook is at the intersection of economics and ethics.

Chapter 45: Needs and Agency

Lawrence Hamilton

Subjects: economics and finance, behavioural and experimental economics, history of economic thought


Lawrence Hamilton The concept of ‘human needs’ is conspicuous by its absence in modern economics. This is especially true of neoclassical economics, ever since Marshall criticized Smith’s and Ricardo’s distinction between ‘necessaries’ and ‘luxuries’ (Marshall [1920] 1964, pp. 56–7). However, most forms of mainstream economic analysis in fact are neglectful of the concept, as exemplified by the omission of an entry for ‘needs’ in the four-volume New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (Eatwell et al. 1998). This is odd but not difficult to explain. It is odd because, at least in part, economics is about understanding human agency and motivation, and human needs constitute one very important component of human motivation to act. Moreover, as exemplified in the work of, amongst others, Aristotle (1980, 1988), Smith ([1776] 1975, [1790] 1976), Marx ([1932] 1992, [1847] 1976, [1939–41] 1973, [1867] 1976–78, [1890–91] 1996) and Sen (1985a, 1985b, [1997] 1987a, 1987b, 1993a, 1993b; Hamilton 1999), economic and political discourses and institutions have always been characterized by constant recourse to the idea of ‘need’ (Wiggins 1998, p. 4n; Hamilton 2003, p. 9). Thus, mainstream economics excludes a central component of human motivation in general and of economic and political discourse in particular. It does so as a consequence of the triumph of utilitarianism within economics and the concomitant reduction of human agency to utility maximization. The focus of this chapter is on how this omission impairs our understanding of the social, economic and political practices and goods that determine how we...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information