Table of Contents

Handbook of Economics and Ethics

Handbook of Economics and Ethics

Elgar original reference

Edited by Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren

The Handbook of Economics and Ethics portrays an understanding of economic methodology in which facts and values, though distinct, are closely interconnected in a variety of ways. From theory building to data collection, and from modelling to policy evaluation, this encyclopaedic Handbook is at the intersection of economics and ethics.

Chapter 61: Scarcity

Rutger Claassen

Subjects: economics and finance, behavioural and experimental economics, history of economic thought


Rutger Claassen The postulate of scarcity in economic science The scarcity postulate delineates the object field of modern economic theory.1 Although it was already implicit in theories of marginal utility of the 1870s (Xenos 1989, p. 67), its most authoritative statement is found in Lionel Robbins’s essay on the nature and significance of economic science. Robbins contrasted the ‘materialist definition’, which maintains that economics is the study of the causes of material welfare, with the ‘scarcity definition’, which maintains that economics studies the allocation of scarce means between competing ends (Robbins [1932] 1984, pp. 12–15). According to the latter definition, both ends and means can be of a material or a non-material nature. For example, the need for aesthetic beauty or religious inspiration is no less potentially subject to scarcity of means than the need for bread and butter. The satisfaction of all of these different types of needs under conditions of scarcity marks the ‘economic aspect’ of action. Since every action has such an economic aspect, every action is a legitimate subject of economic analysis. Thus the domain of economics is principally unlimited.2 For Robbins, and most economists after him, scarcity is characteristic of the human condition.3 It arises from the unavoidable opposition of endless wants and limited means to satisfy these wants. The concept of ‘opportunity costs’ explains why means (time and resources) are always limited in supply: every choice for one course of action implies the costly sacrifice of alternative courses of action. Under these conditions,...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information