Table of Contents

Europe and Global Climate Change

Europe and Global Climate Change

Politics, Foreign Policy and Regional Cooperation

Edited by Paul G. Harris

The core objective of this book is to better understand the role of foreign policy – the crossovers and interactions between domestic and international politics and policies – in efforts to preserve the environment and natural resources. Underlying this objective is the belief that it is not enough to analyze domestic or international political actors, institutions and processes by themselves. We need to understand the interactions among them, something that explicit thought about foreign policy can help us do.

Chapter 6: Sweden, Climate Change and the EU Context

Kate E. Marshall

Subjects: environment, climate change, environmental politics and policy, environmental sociology, politics and public policy, environmental politics and policy, public policy


Kate E Marshall INTRODUCTION The 1995 accession of Sweden to the European Union (EU) was largely viewed with promise, as perhaps ushering in a new era of more environmentally sensitive behavior by the EU. The effects that EU membership would have on Sweden’s domestic policies were hotly debated within Sweden, and the left and green parties took an anti-accession stance (Miles 1997: 26). However, outside of Sweden the environmental benefits of Swedish membership in the EU were less contested, as Sweden was seen as bolstering the general level of environmental awareness among EU member states. In concert with Finland and Austria, who also joined in 1995, Sweden was a potential coalition partner with Denmark, thereby forming a ‘Nordic block’ to advance environmental issues within the EU (Barnes 1996: 217–18). This was a well-founded expectation, given the strong history of environmental cooperation among the Nordic states in the Nordic Council (Barnes 1996: 218), as well as the high environmental standards each state maintained individually. A perfect alliance with perfect outcomes was not expected; the ability of states to influence EU policy is subject to limits, and the Nordic EU members have national rivalries, as well as differing national policies and national political preferences on some issues (Barnes 1996: 217–18). All the same, the accession of a state with a proven history of progressive international environmental cooperation was cause for increased environmental expectations. While the environmental record of Sweden is certainly laudable, Sweden has not always made environmentally...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information