Digital Copyright and the Consumer Revolution

Digital Copyright and the Consumer Revolution

Hands off my iPod

Matthew Rimmer

With a focus on recent US copyright law, the book charts the consumer rebellion against the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act 1998 (US) and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998 (US). The author explores the significance of key judicial rulings and considers legal controversies over new technologies, such as the iPod, TiVo, Sony Playstation II, Google Book Search, and peer-to-peer networks. The book also highlights cultural developments, such as the emergence of digital sampling and mash-ups, the construction of the BBC Creative Archive, and the evolution of the Creative Commons.

Conclusion: A Consumer'ês Manifesto, the Declaration of Innovation Independence

Matthew Rimmer

Subjects: law - academic, intellectual property law


Conclusion: a consumer’s manifesto, the declaration of innovation independence Consumers hold the key to the balance of power for tomorrow’s Internet. They are powerful because they drive markets and because many vote. If they remain satisfied with the Internet’s generative characteristics – continuing to buy the hardware and software that make it possible and to subscribe to ISPs that offer unfiltered access to the Internet at large – then the regulatory and industry forces that might otherwise wish to constrain the Internet will remain in check, maintaining a generative equilibrium. If, in contrast, consumers change their view – not simply tolerating a locked-down Internet but embracing it outright – then the balance among competing interests that has favored generative innovation will tilt away from it. (Jonathan Zittrain, ‘The Generative Internet’1) This book has depicted a consumer revolution against digital copyright laws, particularly as they are represented by the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act 1998 (US) (the Sonny Bono Act) and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act 1998 (US) (DMCA). As David Bollier notes, this movement has a broad membership: Despite the troubling trajectory that intellectual property law has taken over the past generation, a new movement to assert the public interest is starting to take shape and gain momentum. Key constituencies such as consumers, artists, librarians, computer professionals, academics, and scientists have become active players in the debates, and partners in advocacy. The general public, too, has become far more attentive. Ever since the Napster controversy dramatized the everyday implications of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information