Table of Contents

Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Geographical Indications

Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Geographical Indications

Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property series

Edited by Dev S. Gangjee

Provenance matters like never before. Legal regimes regulating the use of Geographical Indications (GIs) protect commercially valuable signs on products – such as Darjeeling and Champagne – which signal the link to their regions of origin. Such regimes have been controversial for over a century. A rich, interdisciplinary work of scholarship, this Research Handbook explores the reasons for and consequences of GIs existing as a distinct category within intellectual property (IP) law. Historians, geographers, sociologists, economists and anthropologists join IP specialists to explore the distinguishing feature of GIs, that certain products are distinctively linked or anchored to specific places.

Chapter 8: International protection of Geographical Indications: the WTO multilateral register negotiations

José Manuel Cortés Martín

Subjects: business and management, knowledge management, innovation and technology, knowledge management, law - academic, intellectual property law


One of the features of the TRIPS Agreement at the time of its adoption was that not all categories of intellectual property rights regulated therein had the same degree of legal or doctrinal development at the national level; neither had they the same degree of acceptance among countries. This was the case with Geographical Indications (GIs), a peculiar type of intellectual property asset because they do not confer individual rights (such as in the case of patents and trade marks) but rather ‘collective rights’. In such a case, the right over a geographical name does not belong to a single company, but to all producers in a given geographic area that respect a specific code of conduct. Furthermore, the exclusive rights granted by GIs do not extend to exclusivity over a certain category of products, as in the case of patents. The producers of Sherry wine are not entitled, nor do they wish, to prevent others from producing similar wine. The right conferred by the GI is limited to banning competitors outside the defined geographic area (or inside the geographic area, for those not respecting the product specification) from using the name ‘Sherry’ in connection with their products.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information