Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations

Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations

Research Handbooks in International Law series

Edited by Jan Klabbers and Åsa Wallendahl

This pioneering Research Handbook with contributions from renowned experts, provides an overview of the general doctrines making up the law of international organizations.

Chapter 10: Dispute Settlement

Kirsten Schmalenbach

Subjects: asian studies, asian law, law - academic, asian law, european law, human rights, intellectual property law, international economic law, trade law, public international law, politics and public policy, human rights, international politics, international relations


Kirsten Schmalenbach INTRODUCTION Where there is a law, there is a dispute; where there is a dispute, there is – by some means or other – a dispute settlement mechanism. Admittedly, the international legal order is not renowned for providing sophisticated dispute settlement mechanisms. There is no denying, though, that a multitude of dispute settlement mechanisms operate on the international plane these days. Chapters VI and VIII of the UN (United Nations) Charter dedicate themselves to this topic in all its aspects and, at the same time, support the key role of international organizations in this field; the role in question being that of an ‘objective’ conciliator in a dispute between at least two parties, who are advocating opposing views concerning a matter of policy or of law (Merrills, 2005: 1). Not particularly in the focus of public interest, and understandably ignored by the UN Charter, international organizations themselves may also be parties to a dispute (as applicant or respondent) and therefore subjected to dispute settlement mechanisms in one form or another. International Dispute Settlement: A Sketch As a result of the principle of free choice of means, as stipulated in Art. 33 of the UN Charter, the models of international dispute settlement are manifold. On closer examination, however, they basically comprise various combinations of different institutional settings, methods of dispute resolution and assigned powers.1 Referring to the institutional setting, two major forms of dispute settlement can be distinguished: in the course of internal dispute settlement, e.g. bilateral negotiations, the disputants keep...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information