China’s New Industrialization Strategy

China’s New Industrialization Strategy

Was Chairman Mao Really Necessary?

Y. Y. Kueh

Deng Xiaoping’s economic strategy is widely regarded as a complete anathema to Mao’s, but this study strongly argues that without the material foundations laid by Mao, it would have been very difficult for Deng to launch his reform and open-door policy. Deng basically shared Mao’s aspirations and approach in pursuit of China’s industrialization, and this had in fact helped to condition him to the successful gradualist methodology. Deng lost patience at times and resorted to the ‘big bang’ strategy, only to fail miserably. Taken together, the book tells a new story about the economics of China’s transition. This is a highly thought-provoking study, blending institutional and convincing statistical analysis.

Chapter 2: Was Mao Really Necessary? An Economist’s Perspective

Y. Y. Kueh

Subjects: asian studies, asian economics, economics and finance, asian economics, economic psychology


* WHY THE QUESTION AND HOW I ANSWER IT We are all aware that, twenty years after Chairman Mao’s death, his giant portrait still hangs aloft at the Tiananmen Square, and that the Mao mausoleum in Beijing has comfortably survived its builder, Mr Hua Guofeng, the hand-picked heir apparent, who, after serving for the interregnum in 1977–78, had entirely vanished into political oblivion. There is no doubt that, as the founder of the People’s Republic of China, Mao is guaranteed a permanent place in the Chinese pantheon, and that, to historically minded Chinese, Mao will always be revered as the Chinese hero who liberated the country from a century of imperialist plunder and humiliation. However, there is also little doubt that the legendary Chairman, increasingly revered as a distant, historical figure, is becoming an abstraction, remote from the detailed examination of his real role in China’s development. As a matter of fact, for many, if not the majority, of Chinese, Mao’s contribution really consisted in the founding of the People’s Republic. After that, he is best remembered for the débâcle of the Great Leap Forward and the havoc brought about by the Cultural Revolution of 1966 to 1976. To be specific, in economic terms, the post-1949 Mao is now widely considered to have been more a negative rather than a positive figure. This perception or conclusion of the post-mortem has in fact become so popular, and so deeply ingrained in everybody’s mind, that it is now almost...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information