Table of Contents

Handbook on Multi-level Governance

Handbook on Multi-level Governance

Elgar original reference

Edited by Henrik Enderlein, Sonja Wälti and Michael Zürn

Scholarship of multi-level governance has developed into one of the most innovative themes of research in political science and public policy. This accessible Handbook presents a thorough review of the wide-ranging literature, encompassing various theoretical and conceptual approaches to multi-level governance and their application to policy-making in domestic, regional and global contexts.

Chapter 1: Types of Multi-level Governance

Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks

Subjects: politics and public policy, public policy, regulation and governance

Extract

Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks1 Centralized authority has given way to new forms of governing.2 Formal authority has been dispersed from central states both up to supranational institutions and down to regional and local governments. A survey finds that 63 of 75 developing countries have been undergoing some decentralization of authority (Garman et al. 2001, p. 205). An index of regional authority in 42 democracies and semi-democracies reveals that 29 countries have regionalized and only two have become more centralized since 1950 (Hooghe et al. 2010). The last two decades have also seen the creation of a large number of transnational regimes, some of which exercise real supranational authority. At the same time, public/private networks of diverse kinds have multiplied from the local to the international level. The diffusion of authority in new political forms has led to a profusion of new terms: multi-level governance, multi-tiered governance, polycentric governance, multiperspectival governance, FOCJ (functional, overlapping and competing jurisdictions), fragmegration, the post-national state, consortio, and condominio, to name but a few. The evolution of similar ideas in different fields can be explained as diffusion from several literatures – federalism, public policy, urban studies, and international regimes. These literatures agree that the dispersion of governance across multiple jurisdictions is both more efficient than, and normatively superior to, central state monopoly. The core belief is that governance must operate at multiple scales in order to capture variations in the territorial reach of policy externalities. Because externalities arising from the provision of public goods vary immensely...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information