Table of Contents

Handbook on Multi-level Governance

Handbook on Multi-level Governance

Elgar original reference

Edited by Henrik Enderlein, Sonja Wälti and Michael Zürn

Scholarship of multi-level governance has developed into one of the most innovative themes of research in political science and public policy. This accessible Handbook presents a thorough review of the wide-ranging literature, encompassing various theoretical and conceptual approaches to multi-level governance and their application to policy-making in domestic, regional and global contexts.

Chapter 2: Federalism and Optimal Allocation Across Levels of Governance

Benny Geys and Kai A. Konrad

Subjects: politics and public policy, public policy, regulation and governance

Extract

Benny Geys and Kai A. Konrad 2.1 INTRODUCTION Countries differ in their governmental architectures and in the rules that describe the allocation of tasks, rights and duties across the various levels of government. Figure 2.1 displays the architecture of two (hypothetical) countries by way of illustration. Country A on the left-hand side has two levels of government: a central government at the highest level and many small jurisdictions at the lower level. Country B on the right-hand side has three layers of government: a central government at the highest level, two ‘regional’ governments representing an ‘intermediate’ level of government and several small jurisdictions at the third and lowest level. Clearly, these are only two possible constellations. Treisman (2000) analyses a large set of countries and finds government architectures involving between one (Singapore) and six layers of government (Russia). Many of these real-world government architectures are (significantly) more complicated than the ones depicted in Figure 2.1. Moreover, countries’ government architectures are not static, but subject to often substantial change. Such reforms are habitually the focus of intense political debates. Föderalismusreform I (in 2006) and II (in 2009) in Germany and the debates about a further reorganization (or, more specifically, regionalization) of the government architecture in Belgium since the federal elections of June 2007 are illustrative. Similar debates exist also in many developing countries, and are high on the agenda of international organizations such as the World Bank or the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which often act as consultants in the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information