Table of Contents

Research Handbook on International Criminal Law

Research Handbook on International Criminal Law

Research Handbooks in International Law series

Edited by Bartram S. Brown

This carefully regarded and well-structured handbook covers the broad range of norms, practices, policies, processes and institutional mechanisms of international criminal law, exploring how they operate and continue to develop in a variety of contexts. Leading scholars in the field and experienced practitioners have brought together their expertise and perspectives in a clear and concise fashion to create an authoritative resource, which will be useful and accessible even to those without legal training.

Chapter 15: Universal jurisdiction

Naomi Roht-Arriaza and Menaka Fernando

Subjects: law - academic, criminal law and justice, human rights, public international law, politics and public policy, human rights


Naomi Roht-Arriaza and Menaka Fernando Universal jurisdiction is a jurisdictional principle of international criminal law that allows a state to prosecute certain crimes based on the nature of the crime, regardless of where the crimes occurred or whether the prosecuting state has any territorial or nationality-based connection to them. Crimes for which universal jurisdiction may apply include war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, torture and enforced disappearances.1 The doctrine of universality was traditionally associated with the crime of piracy, but gained wider application in the post-Second World War era with the prosecution of Nazi-era crimes. For example, Israel utilized the concept of universal jurisdiction in prosecuting Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem in 1961 when the Israeli Attorney-General charged Eichmann with war crimes and crimes against humanity. He was abducted from Argentina and brought to stand trial in Israel, a state that did not exist at the time the crimes were committed. He was convicted and executed.2 Universal jurisdiction was not used extensively again until the 1990s, when – for the first time – the doctrine was utilized for crimes outside the post-Second World War context. In 1993, Belgium passed its expansive Act Concerning Grave Breaches of International Humanitarian Law in order to implement its obligations under the 1949 Geneva Conventions. The first prosecutions and convictions under the new law were four Rwandan defendants present in Belgium, who were prosecuted for war crimes against Tutsi and internally displaced persons during Rwanda’s genocide in 1994.3 A number of cases in Germany concerning genocide in Bosnia-Herzegovina...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information