Table of Contents

Setting Priorities for HIV/AIDS Interventions

Setting Priorities for HIV/AIDS Interventions

A Cost–Benefit Approach

Robert J. Brent

HIV/AIDS is much too complex a phenomenon to be understood only by reference to common sense and ethical codes. This book presents the cost–benefit analysis (CBA) framework in a well-researched and accessible manner to ensure that the most important considerations are recognized and incorporated.

Chapter 43: Conclusions II: Using CBA to Set Priorities for HIV

Robert J. Brent

Subjects: development studies, development economics, economics and finance, development economics, health policy and economics, public finance, social policy and sociology, health policy and economics


Critics of CBA, who wish to avoid its use on the grounds that willingness to pay does not allow for ability to pay, risk the proverbial problem of “throwing out the baby with the bathwater”. So the strengths of using WTP are ignored by the critics. This is unfortunate as much of the politics of HIV/AIDS involves activists thinking that they have to get organized and petition governments in order that a particular perspective be incorporated in the HIV/AIDS decision-making process when, in fact, every perspective would automatically be included if a cost–benefit framework using WTP were used. We have throughout the book emphasized that CBA tries to include all the effects of an intervention by estimating the WTP of everyone who is affected by it. The main task in this chapter is to spell out some of the implications of this all-inclusive property of CBA. As this is the final chapter, the summary and conclusions section briefly sums up what this book has tried to achieve. WILLINGNESS TO PAY AND SOCIAL INCLUSIVENESS WTP records individual preferences and the intensity of those preferences. When we say that the net benefits of a project are the sum of the WTP of all those affected, we are stating that, no matter whether these net benefits are positive or negative, we have included everyone’s preferences in the evaluation and these preferences will determine the decision outcome. Only if decisions are not made on the basis of WTP do activist groups need to...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information