Table of Contents

Research Handbook on the Future of EU Copyright

Research Handbook on the Future of EU Copyright

Research Handbooks in Intellectual Property series

Edited by Estelle Derclaye

It has been over fifteen years since the EU started harmonising copyright law. This original Handbook takes stock and questions what the future of EU copyright should be. What went wrong with the harmonisation acquis? What did the directives do well? Should copyright be further harmonised? Each of the 25 recognised copyright experts from different European countries gives a critical account of the EU harmonisation carried out on several aspects of copyright law (subject-matter, originality, duration, rights, defences etc.), and asks whether further harmonisation is desirable or not. This way, the Handbook not only gives guidance to European institutions as to what remains to be done or needs to be remedied but is also the first overall picture of current and future EU copyright law.

Chapter 4: The Subject-Matter for Film Protection in Europe

Pascal Kamina

Subjects: law - academic, intellectual property law


3 Subject matter Tanya Aplin Introduction This chapter examines the extent to which the European Union (‘EU’), in the field of copyright or droit d’auteur,1 has adopted harmonized notions of subject matter and whether a unified approach to determining protectable subject matter should be adopted in the future. The discussion occurs in several sections. Sections 1 and 2 set the scene by addressing the international position under the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works 1886 (‘Berne’) and the basic differences between EU Member States. Section 3 discusses the EU harmonization of copyright law protection of subject matter to date, while Section 4 assesses the extent to which this harmonization has been successful. Finally, Section 5 analyses whether further harmonization should occur, in particular, in respect of the definition of computer programs, and whether there should be a unified ‘open list’ or ‘closed list’ approach. 1. International position In considering the scope of subject matter protected by copyright or droit d’auteur the logical starting point is, of course, Berne. Article 2(1) of Berne stipulates that ‘the expression “literary and artistic works” shall include every production in the literary, scientific and artistic domain, whatever may be the mode or form of its expression’ and goes on to provide an extensive but nonexhaustive list of examples. Some of the more notable works listed are: books, lectures, dramatic works, musical compositions, cinematographic works, paintings, sculptures, photographic works, and works of applied art. The principles of national treatment and...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information